Wall Street gone, but not forgotten

Share on Facebook1Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Google+1Share on TumblrPin on Pinterest0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone

Photo by Claire Esparros.

“You can’t evict an idea.” The catchphrase of the Occupy movement still resonates, though the momentum itself has slowed down. The mass of 99 percent-ers protesting American capitalism and unequal wealth distribution has, after a solid three months, faded out of sight. The media coverage of the Occupy movements has fizzled out, and attention to the topic has dwindled as most encampments across the country have been shut down and the protests have diminished as winter set in.

As 2011 came to a close, the movement seemed to end along with it, and with the fresh start of the new year the once hot-to-the-touch, buzzed about topic had naturally slipped out of the foreground. Looking back on the dynamic events that marked the protests against corporate greed and economic imbalance, it would be wrong to say that the movement has passed as a forgotten annoyance of the past. The Occupy efforts may be out of immediate sight, but they certainly are not out mind.

The impassioned zeal of the protesters who joined the Occupy movement, which originated in New York City with protests on Wall Street, proved to be irresistible to reporters and photographers, garnering their attention every day from the start. From the initial gathering at Manhattan’s Bowling Green Park on September 17, 2011 and the Zuccotti Park encampment that ensued shortly after, the media was enthralled each subsequent waking hour for the next few months.

The intrigue was obvious – the last time any real protest against the American government took place was during the Vietnam War era with the anti-war protests in the sixties.  And those effects were lasting, influencing and inspiring organized dissent for generations to come. But in today’s society, where immediate gratification is expected to be served on a golden platter and impatience is the new bubonic plague, Americans seem to do a whole lot of talking with a lousy amount of action to compensate. For all the moaning and groaning about economic inequality, the lack of action and surplus of apathy had gone too far. It was time to take the talking to the streets, and relay a message worth hearing.

“The one thing we have in common is that we are the 99 percent and we will no longer tolerate the greed and corruption of the 1 percent,” reads a statement from before the start of the protests on the official website for the national movement, OccupyWallStreet.org.  Occupiers assembled in major cities all across the country, using social media to gather and organize their movement and implementing a rhetoric that captured enough attention to get into the political hemisphere. And now, with presidential campaigning moving front and center, the Occupiers’ ideas have organically trickled into the discussion, proving that their message was heard.

It echoed in Obama’s State of the Union address, when he told Congress, “It’s time to apply the same rules from top to bottom. No bailouts, no handouts, and no cop-outs. An America built to last insists on responsibility from everybody.”

Photo by Claire Esparros

The occupiers had a lot opposition from the start, but their forces were strong and abundant. They were resented by many, those of which just never gave them the time of day, and automatically dismissed their cause assuming everyone involved was a “dirty hippie,” homeless, perpetually unemployed and uneducated. Those who refused to understand the efforts of those at the heart of the movement were just as ignorant as those they blindly mocked and condoned.

Those disgruntled by the movement often criticized it with accusations of being disorganized and lacking in purpose. While undoubtedly these statements could have been applied to a percentage of those who joined the Occupy forces, using such a blanket statement was obtuse. From the beginning, those who organized the movements stated that Occupy Wall Street began on the platform of gathering to “protest the influence of corporate money on American politics…and to persuade Obama to establish a commission that would end the influence money has over representatives in Washington,” according to a September 18 article from CBS news.

The New York Times recognized the movement on their “Times Topics” blog as “a stand against corporate greed, social inequality and the corrosive power of major banks and multinational corporations over the democratic process.” Taking a closer look at various media who followed the Occupy events from their start to their peak to close, it is clear that the general consensus is that the movement Occupy has ended – at least temporarily. But there is a difference between an ending and a conclusion. The Occupy movement has not concluded – there was not one final outcome that gave way for a natural reason to stop the protests, but rather a gradual fade-out due to resistance and failed attempts from the protesters to get what they wanted in combination with the winter weather. It wasn’t a bailout or a surrender, but merely a natural close to an attempt to be heard. The occupiers were bound to eventually lose steam, but their message has continued to resonate where it matters. And without a conclusion, can the movement really be dead? Not if it has an impact or sparks a future call to action. The only way to tell if it’s over is to see what happens next. You can’t evict an idea whose time is yet to come. Thus, only time can tell.

Share on Facebook1Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Google+1Share on TumblrPin on Pinterest0Share on Reddit0Email this to someone
  • Zkamel

    Are you even in New York City? Do you only get your information from mainstream media? There are daily protests. The movement is absolutely, undeniably, in a lull for the Winter, with big plans to re-emerge in the Spring. Do some research before you post disheartening, untruthful journalism such as this making it seem as if the movement is dead.

    • Claire

      I have done extensive amounts of research and followed the movement on every variety of media source I could get my hands on from the day it began. My intent was far from “killing off” the movement with opinion, but rather to illustrate that while its momentum has (undeniably) slowed down with the “lull of Winter,” as you said, there is great potential still for something to happen again. This article should not be seen as “disheartening,” but rather a fond and uplifting reflection on what happened with hope for what’s to come. I highlighted the diminishing attention from the media, which is factual, not my personal opinion. It is important to note the current truth of a situation in weighing it as a whole. This article is also in the “Opinions” section, so by nature, my opinion is to be stated, as well as expected to be disagreed with. I hope that you can go back and see what I actually said, as it seems perhaps my point was missed.

      • Zkamel

        I understand that this article was posted in the “opinions” section, and yes, it contains particles of hope; however, throughout your article, you insinuate that the movement has faded away. You are essentially saying the orignal movement and masses have faded away yet the idea is still intact. I would just like to point out that this statement is not accurate. While the movement may have “faded” from the spotlight of the mainstream media, with very little research, one can see that the movement is in fact in full swing, which was never mentioned in your article. If MSNBC decides to divert their attention, that doesn’t mean the movement is gone. In this past week, we have seen hundreds organize on the steps of the Virginia Supreme Court, thousands congregated at the California State Capitol building, and several marches have been held in New York City with a large turn out. People day in and day out are organizing in cities across the world. If you go to nycga.net, or occupywallst.org, you can see the actions taking place, the general assembly and spokes council that still meet on a regular basis. I appreciate your optimism in the article regarding the fact that you have hope for what’s to come, but posting an article titled “Wall Street Gone but Not Forgotten,” using effectively what could be considered a eulogy in responding to the protests, is certainly not helpful or uplifting for people who participate in the protests and organization on a daily basis.

  • Pingback: Wall Street gone, but not forgotten – The Pendulum | PAULitics.US – Wake Up America()

QR Code Business Card